Ç¥ÁØÈ­ Âü¿©¾È³»

TTAÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÇöȲ

Ȩ > Ç¥ÁØÈ­ °³¿ä > TTAÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÇöȲ

Ç¥ÁعøÈ£ TTAE.IF-RFC5942 ±¸Ç¥ÁعøÈ£
Á¦°³Á¤ÀÏ 2011-12-21 ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö 26
ÇѱÛÇ¥Áظí IPv6 ¼­ºê³Ý ¸ðµ¨: ¸µÅ©¿Í ¼­ºê³Ý ÇÁ¸®ÇȽº °£ÀÇ °ü°è
¿µ¹®Ç¥Áظí IPv6 Subnet Model: The Relationship between Links and Subnet Prefixes
Çѱ۳»¿ë¿ä¾à IPv6 ¼­ºê³Ý ¸ðµ¨°ú IPv4 ¼­ºê³Ý ¸ðµ¨Àº Â÷ÀÌÁ¡À» °¡Áö°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇØ »óÈ£ °£¿¡ À߸øµÈ µ¿ÀÛÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÑ´Ù. º» Ç¥ÁØ¿¡¼­´Â IPv6 ÁÖ¼ÒÀÇ IPv6 ¿Â-¸µÅ© ÇÁ¸®ÇȽº°¡ ÀÚµ¿À¸·Î °áºÎ µÉ ¼ö ¾øÀ½À» ±â¼úÇÏ¸ç ¶ÇÇÑ RFC 4861ÀÇ ¡°¿Â-¸µÅ©¡± Á¤ÀǸ¦ Ãß°¡ÀûÀ¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ® ÇÑ´Ù.
¿µ¹®³»¿ë¿ä¾à IPv6 specifies a model of a subnet that is different than the IPv4 subnet model. The subtlety of the differences has resulted in incorrect implementations that do not interoperate. This document spells out the most important difference: that an IPv6 address isn¡¯t automatically associated with an IPv6 on-link prefix. This document also updates (partially due to security concerns caused by incorrect implementations) a part of the definition of "on-link" from RFC 4861.
±¹Á¦Ç¥ÁØ
°ü·ÃÆÄÀÏ TTAE_[1].IF-RFC5942.pdf TTAE_[1].IF-RFC5942.pdf            

ÀÌÀü
ÆÐŶ Àü´Þ¸Á(PTN)¿¡¼­ MPLS-TP ¼±Çü º¸È£Àýü
´ÙÀ½
ÄÜÅÙÃ÷ Àü´Þ¸Á(CDN) »óÈ£ Á¢¼Ó¿ë ¿ä±¸ ¶ó¿ìÆà ÀçÀü´Þ ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽º