Ç¥ÁØÈ­ Âü¿©¾È³»

TTAÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÇöȲ

Ȩ > Ç¥ÁØÈ­ °³¿ä > TTAÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÇöȲ

Ç¥ÁعøÈ£ TTAE.IF-RFC6777 ±¸Ç¥ÁعøÈ£
Á¦°³Á¤ÀÏ 2013-12-18 ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö 43
ÇѱÛÇ¥Áظí GMPLS¿Í MPLS-TE ¸Á¿¡¼­ ·¹ÀÌºí ½ºÀ§Ä¡ °æ·ÎÀÇ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ °æ·Î Áö¿¬ ¸ÞÆ®¸¯
¿µ¹®Ç¥Áظí Label Switched Path (LSP) Data Path Delay Metrics in Generalized MPLS and MPLS Traffic Engineering (MPLS-TE) Networks
Çѱ۳»¿ë¿ä¾à GMPLS ¿Í MPLS-TE ³×Æ®¿öÅ©¿¡¼­ LSP(Label Switched Path)¸¦ ¼³Á¤ÇÒ ¶§, ½Ã±×³Î¸µ
Á¾·á°¡ LSP ±³Â÷ ¿¬°áÀÇ ¼º°øÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»´Â °ÍÀº ¾Æ´Ï´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼Õ½Ç °¡´É¼ºÀ»
¸·±â À§ÇÏ¿© °æ·Î Áö¿¬ ¸ÞÆ®¸¯À» Á¤ÀÇÇÔÀ¸·Î½á LSP ¸¦ ÅëÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¿¬°á ½Ã ¼Õ½Ç
°¡´É¼ºÀ» ÁÙ¿©ÁØ´Ù
¿µ¹®³»¿ë¿ä¾à When setting up a Label Switched Path (LSP) in Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) and
MPLS Traffic Engineering (MPLS-TE) networks, the completion of the signaling
process does not necessarily mean that the cross-connection along the LSP has been
programmed accordingly and in a timely manner. Meanwhile, the completion of the
signaling process may be used by LSP users or applications that control their use as
an indication that the data path has become usable. The existence of the
inconsistency between the signaling messages and cross-connection programming,
and the possible failure of cross-connection programming, if not properly treated, will
result in data loss or even application failure. Characterization of this performance
can thus help designers to improve the way in which LSPs are used and to make
applications or tools that depend on and use LSPs more robust. This standard defines
a series of performance metrics to evaluate the connectivity of the data path in the
signaling process.
±¹Á¦Ç¥ÁØ
°ü·ÃÆÄÀÏ TTAE.IF-RFC6777.PDF TTAE.IF-RFC6777.PDF            

ÀÌÀü
¸Á¿ä¼Ò °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ÀÇ ±¤Àü´Þ¸Á ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝ Á߸³ °ü¸® Á¤º¸ ¸ðµ¨
´ÙÀ½
DetNet ¼­ºñ½º¸¦ À§ÇÑ Yang µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¸ðµ¨: MPLS-TP¸¦ ÅëÇÑ ½Ã°£¹Î°¨Çü ³×Æ®¿öÅ·(TSN)