Ç¥ÁØÈ­ Âü¿©¾È³»

TTAÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÇöȲ

Ȩ > Ç¥ÁØÈ­ °³¿ä > TTAÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÇöȲ

Ç¥ÁعøÈ£ [ÆóÁö] TTAK.OT-10.0209 ±¸Ç¥ÁعøÈ£
Á¦°³Á¤ÀÏ 2008-12-19 ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö 62
ÇѱÛÇ¥ÁØ¸í ·Îº¿ Ŭ¶óÀ̾ðÆ® °ü¸®
¿µ¹®Ç¥Áظí The Management of Robot Clients
Çѱ۳»¿ë¿ä¾à º» Ç¥ÁØÀº URC ·Îº¿À» ¿ø°Ý°ü¸®Çϱâ À§ÇÑ °øÅë °ü¸® Ç׸ñÀ» Á¤ÀÇÇϸç, »óÀÌÇÑ Ç÷§ÆûÀ» °¡Áø URC ·Îº¿ ÀåÄ¡¿¡ ÀÀ¿ë ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ ÀÇÁ¸¼ºÀ» ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­ÇÏ°í Ç÷§Æû°£ÀÇ À̽ļºÀ» Çâ»ó½ÃÅ°±â À§ÇÑ ÀåÄ¡ Á¢±Ù¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °øÅëµÈ ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽º (API) Áß ¿ø°Ý Áø´Ü¿¡ °üÇÑ ºÎºÐÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÑ´Ù.
¿µ¹®³»¿ë¿ä¾à We don¡¯t guarantee URC Servers compatibility only standard communication protocol between robot clients because of the various robot client connection procedures and different robot profile information. So, this documents regard as standardization of the robot client connection and profiling. We would expect difficult work to develop and adapt standard managing specification if each company will defines different managing item. So, we would define common managing item to remote control robots and minimizes dependability of the application program as URC robot devices. We suggest remote diagonosis common interface (API) regard to device access to compatibility implementation as multiple platforms.
±¹Á¦Ç¥ÁØ
°ü·ÃÆÄÀÏ TTAK.OT-10.0209.zip

ÀÌÀü
SOiVA ¼­ºñ½º ¸ðµ¨ ¹× ½Ã³ª¸®¿À; Part4: SOiVA Áß°³¿ë ÀÎÁõ ó¸® ¼­ºñ½º ¸ðµ¨ ±¸Á¶
´ÙÀ½
SOiVA ¼­ºñ½º ¸ðµ¨ ¹× ½Ã³ª¸®¿À; Part6: SOiVA Áß°³¿ë ÀúÀÛ±Ç ÀÌ¾ç ¹× ¶óÀ̼¾½Ì ¼­ºñ½º ¸ðµ¨ ±¸Á¶