Ç¥ÁØÈ­ Âü¿©¾È³»

TTAÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÇöȲ

Ȩ > Ç¥ÁØÈ­ °³¿ä > TTAÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÇöȲ

Ç¥ÁعøÈ£ TTAE.OT-11.0030 ±¸Ç¥ÁعøÈ£
Á¦°³Á¤ÀÏ 2016-12-27 ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö 51
ÇѱÛÇ¥Áظí À§Çè°ü¸®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ IALA Áöħ
¿µ¹®Ç¥Áظí IALA Guideline on Risk Management
Çѱ۳»¿ë¿ä¾à ÀÌ Ç¥ÁØÀº ¼ö·Î¿¡¼­ ¸ðµç À§Çè¿ä¼Ò¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÔÀ¸·Î¼­ ¼±¹ÚÅëÇ༭ºñ½º(VTS)¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ¿© Ç×·ÎÇ¥Áö(AtoN)À» À§ÇÑ À§Çè°ü¸® ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î ¼³¸íÇÔÀ¸·Î¼­ ¸ðµç À̵¿ÇÏ´Â À§ÇèÀ» Ç×·ÎÇ¥Áö ´ç±¹¿¡ ÀÇÇØ È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î °ü¸®Çϵµ·Ï ÇÔÀÌ´Ù. PAWSA(Ports and Waterway Safety Assessment; Ç×±¸¿Í ¼ö·Î ¾ÈÀü¼ºÆò°¡)¿Í IALA ¼ö·Î À§Ç輺 Æò°¡ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥(IWRAP MK2)ÀÌ IALA¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ½ÂÀεǾúÀ¸¸ç, Ç×·ÎÇ¥Áö ´ç±¹¿¡ ÀÇÇؼ­µµ ¿©·¯ °¡Áö À§ÇèºÐ¼® µµ±¸°¡ °³¹ßµÇ¾ú´Ù.

ÀÌ Áöħ¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÑ À§Ç輺 Æò°¡¹æ¹ýÀº IMO(MSC/Circ.1023/MEPC/Circ.392)¿¡¼­ ±ÇÀåÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î¼­ °øÀÎ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÆò°¡(FSA: Formal Safety Assessment)¿Í À¯»çÇÏ´Ù.

º» ÁöħÀº À§Ç輺À» Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â ÀýÂ÷·Î¼­ À§Çè¿ä¼Ò½Äº°, À§ÇèÆò°¡, ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ À§ÇèÁ¦¾î ¹æ¾È, ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ ¹× ÇൿÀ¸·Î ³ª´©°í °¢ ´Ü°è¿¡¼­ ¹üÀ§, À§ÇèºÐ¼®°ú À§ÇèÆò°¡ ¹æ¹ý, À§ÇèÁ¦¾î ¹æ¾ÈÀÇ °æÁ¦Àû ºÐ¼®, ÀÜ·ù À§ÇèÁ¤µµ µî¿¡ °üÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¾È³»ÇÑ´Ù.
¿µ¹®³»¿ë¿ä¾à In order that different marine AtoN Authorities or Waterway Managers may consistently follow the methodology of the Guideline, it is described in a clear step-by-step manner. When the methodology is applied, it is important that the process is clearly documented and formally recorded in a uniform and systematic manner. This will ensure the process is transparent and can be easily understood by all parties irrespective of their experience or background in the application of risk assessment and related techniques.
With the advances of e-Navigation the mariner has been provided with additional real time information to assist with navigation. e-Navigation has to be incorporated into the formal risk assessment process. For risk control options the continuous development of e-Navigation and man-machine interfaces may provide new possibilities. However, physical AtoN risk control measures will remain important to address the needs of all user groups. It is important to stress that the output of a risk management process identified in the Guideline is also dependent on the application of Human Factors disciplines. The concept of Human Factors and references to relevant models are therefore included in the guideline. It is recommended that administrations, organisations and persons involved in a risk assessment process have suitable, updated and in-depth knowledge in the application of Human Factors disciplines. Ports and Waterway Safety Assessment (PAWSA) and IALA Waterway Risk Assessment Program (IWRAP MK2) are approved by IALA but there are numerous other risk analysis tools that have been developed by AtoN Authorities. The risk assessment methodology utilised in the Guideline is very similar to the Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) methodology as recommended by IMO (MSC/Circ.1023/MEPC/Circ.392).
±¹Á¦Ç¥ÁØ
°ü·ÃÆÄÀÏ TTAE.OT-11.0030.pdf TTAE.OT-11.0030.pdf            

ÀÌÀü
FIDO À¯´Ï¹ö¼È ÀÌÁßÀÎÁõ(U2F) -Á¦2ºÎ- ÀÚ¹Ù½ºÅ©¸³Æ® API
´ÙÀ½
FIDO À¯´Ï¹ö¼È ÀÌÁßÀÎÁõ(U2F) -Á¦4ºÎ- HID ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝ ±Ô°Ý