Ç¥ÁØÈ­ Âü¿©¾È³»

TTAÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÇöȲ

Ȩ > Ç¥ÁØÈ­ °³¿ä > TTAÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÇöȲ

Ç¥ÁعøÈ£ TTAE.IF-RFC3260 ±¸Ç¥ÁعøÈ£
Á¦°³Á¤ÀÏ 2010-12-23 ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö 13
ÇѱÛÇ¥Áظí Diffserv¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¿ë¾î¿Í ¼³¸í
¿µ¹®Ç¥Áظí New Terminology and Clarifications for Diffserv
Çѱ۳»¿ë¿ä¾à Diffserv°¡ °³¹ßµÊ¿¡ µû¶ó, °ü·Ã ¿ë¾î »ý¼ºÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ´ëµÎµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Diffserv RFC Ç¥ÁØ¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³ªÀÖ´Â Á¤ÀǸ¦ Á¤¸®ÇÒ ÇÊ¿ä°¡ ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¸î¸î ±â¼úÀûÀÎ ±¸ºÐ ¶ÇÇÑ À籸¼ºµÉ ÇÊ¿ä°¡ ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ RFC 2475, RFC 2474, RFC 2597À» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ÀÛ¼ºµÈ ±¹¿Ü Ç¥ÁØÀ» ´ëüÇÑ RFC 3260ÀÌ ¸¸µé¾îÁ³À¸¸ç, ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ ±¹³» Ç¥Áصµ Á¦Á¤ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù
¿µ¹®³»¿ë¿ä¾à As the Diffserv work has evolved, there have been several cases where terminology has needed to be created or the definitions in Diffserv standards track RFCs have needed to be refined. Some minor technical clarifications were also found to be needed. Finally, RFC3260 updates in part RFC 2474, RFC 2475 and RFC 2597. RFC 2598 has been obsoleted by RFC 3246, and clarifications agreed by the group were incorporated in that revision. Therefore, This Recommendation updates standard of TTAS.IF-RFC2475 as conventional standard of IETF RFC 2475 which TTAS.IF-RFC2475 follows had been updated by RFC 3260.
±¹Á¦Ç¥ÁØ
°ü·ÃÆÄÀÏ TTAE.IT-RFC3260_2009-1184.pdf TTAE.IT-RFC3260_2009-1184.pdf            

ÀÌÀü
ISDN »ç¿ëÀÚ-¸Á ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽º ¹× ¾×¼¼½º ´É·Â
´ÙÀ½
1Â÷±º ¼Óµµ »ç¿ëÀÚ-¸Á ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽º-°èÃþ1±Ô°Ý