Ȩ > Ç¥ÁØÈ °³¿ä > TTAÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÇöȲ
Ç¥ÁعøÈ£ | TTAE.IF-RFC8355 | ±¸Ç¥ÁعøÈ£ | |
---|---|---|---|
Á¦°³Á¤ÀÏ | 2018-12-19 | ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö | 26 |
ÇѱÛÇ¥Áظí | ¼¼±×¸ÕÆ® ¶ó¿ìÆà ±â¹ÝÀÇ º¹¿ø·Â È°¿ë »ç·Ê | ||
¿µ¹®Ç¥Áظí | Resiliency Use Cases in Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING) Networks | ||
Çѱ۳»¿ë¿ä¾à | ÀÌ Ç¥ÁØÀº ¼¼±×¸ÕÆ® ¶ó¿ìÆÃÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ³×Æ®¿öÅ© °æ·Î º¸È£ÀÇ È°¿ë »ç·Ê·Î¼, °æ·Îº¸È£, ·ÎÄà º¸È£, Åë½Å»ç¾÷ÀÚÀÇ °ü¸®¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ·ÎÄà º¸È£ µî ¼¼°¡Áö »ç·Ê¸¦ ±â¼úÇÑ´Ù.°æ·Î º¸È£´Â ÀÎÀÔ ³ëµå°¡ Àå¾Ö º¹±¸ÀÇ Ã¥ÀÓÀ» Áö´Â ¹æ¹ýÀÌ¸ç ³ª¸ÓÁö ¹æ¹ýÀº Àå¾Ö³ëµå/¸µÅ©ÀÇ ÁÖº¯ ³ëµå¿¡¼ º¸È£¸¦ ¼öÇàÇÑ´Ù. ·ÎÄà º¸È£´Â ¸µÅ©/³ëÆ® ¿ìȸ º¸È£¿Í ÃÖ´Ü°æ·Î ±â¹Ý º¸È£ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ±â¼úÇÑ´Ù. Åë½Å»ç¾÷ÀÚÀÇ °ü¸®¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ·ÎÄà º¸È£´Â »ç¾÷ÀÚ°¡ ƯÁ¤ Á¤Ã¥À» ¼öÇàÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ·ÎÄà º¸È£ 󸮸¦ °ü¸®ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ Ç¥ÁØÀº ¶ÇÇÑ Æ®·¡ÇÈ ¼Õ½ÇÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â ·çÇÁ ȸÇÇ ¹æ¹ý°ú »ç¾÷ÀÚ°¡ µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¿¡¼ ´Ù¼öÀÇ º¹¿ø·Â ±â¼úÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ» ±â¼úÇÑ´Ù. | ||
¿µ¹®³»¿ë¿ä¾à | The standard describes a set of use cases related to Segment Routing network resiliency, including path protection, local protection without operator management, and local protection with operator management. Path protection lets the ingress node be in charge of the failure Recovery. We discuss two different approaches providing unmanaged local protection, namely link/node bypass protection and shortest pathbased protection. It also illustrates a case allowing the operator to manage the local protection behavior in order to accommodate specific policies. We discuss the opportunity for the SPRING architecture to provide loop-avoidance mechanisms such that transient forwarding state inconsistencies during routing convergence do not lead into traffic loss. The standard illustrates the different use cases and explain how an operator could combine them in the same network. | ||
±¹Á¦Ç¥ÁØ | |||
°ü·ÃÆÄÀÏ | TTAE.IF-RFC8355.pdf |