| 의견항목 |
Editorial Note 삭제
|
| 원 안 |
- 전체 페이지 35 하단 페이지 13 Table 19 Editors Note
Comments:[Editor’s Note: Do we want to add the same comment that we have for Table 20 Item 2 of Section 4.1.3.5 of System Profile to here?]
- 전체 페이지 51 하단 페이지 29 Table 72 Editors Note
Comments: [Editor’s Note: The Accepted CR #653 calls for above requirements of Items 3 and 4 to be applicable to CC FEC. Considering the fact that TWG members believed that the numbers should be revisited for CTC FEC, it is recommended to consider the same requirements for CTC until an agreement by group is developed for possible update. In the case of CTC, the requirements shall be applied to the most sensitive MCS level for each Modulation order. This means for CTC, 64-QAM requirements shall be applied to 64-QAM 5/6 and not to 64-QAM 3/4.]
- 전체 페이지 57 하단 페이지 35의 Editorial Note
Editorial Note 1 The reference in the table 85 (avobe) were broken in the source document, please see what they need to be. We have put in a reference to [2], but please verify that this is correct
- 전체 페이지 62 하단 페이지 40의 Editorial Note
Editorial Note 2 Is the spelling in the title and in row 1 of the table correct? Shouldn’t it be Neighbour ?
- 전체 페이지 73 하단 페이지 51 Table 141
Comments:[Editor’s Note: Do we want to add the same comment that we have for Table 20 Item 2 of Section 4.1.3.5 of System Profile to here?]
- 전체 페이지 85 하단 페이지 63 Table 180
Comments: [Editor’s Note: The Accepted CR #653 calls for above requirements of Items 3 and 4 to be applicable to CC FEC. Considering the fact that TWG members believed that the numbers should be revisited for CTC FEC, it is recommended to consider the same requirements for CTC until an agreement by group is developed for possible update.] |
| 대 안 |
- 전체 페이지 35 하단 페이지 13 Table 19 Editors Note 삭제
Comments:[Editor’s Note: Do we want to add the same comment that we have for Table 20 Item 2 of Section 4.1.3.5 of System Profile to here?]
- 전체 페이지 51 하단 페이지 29 Table 72 Editors Note 삭제
Comments: [Editor’s Note: The Accepted CR #653 calls for above requirements of Items 3 and 4 to be applicable to CC FEC. Considering the fact that TWG members believed that the numbers should be revisited for CTC FEC, it is recommended to consider the same requirements for CTC until an agreement by group is developed for possible update. In the case of CTC, the requirements shall be applied to the most sensitive MCS level for each Modulation order. This means for CTC, 64-QAM requirements shall be applied to 64-QAM 5/6 and not to 64-QAM 3/4.]
- 전체 페이지 57 하단 페이지 35의 Editorial Note 삭제
Editorial Note 1 The reference in the table 85 (avobe) were broken in the source document, please see what they need to be. We have put in a reference to [2], but please verify that this is correct
- 전체 페이지 62 하단 페이지 40의 Editorial Note 삭제
Editorial Note 2 Is the spelling in the title and in row 1 of the table correct? Shouldn’t it be Neighbour ?
- 전체 페이지 73 하단 페이지 51 Table 141 삭제
Comments:[Editor’s Note: Do we want to add the same comment that we have for Table 20 Item 2 of Section 4.1.3.5 of System Profile to here?]
- 전체 페이지 85 하단 페이지 63 Table 180 삭제
Comments: [Editor’s Note: The Accepted CR #653 calls for above requirements of Items 3 and 4 to be applicable to CC FEC. Considering the fact that TWG members believed that the numbers should be revisited for CTC FEC, it is recommended to consider the same requirements for CTC until an agreement by group is developed for possible update.] |
| 사 유 |
Editorial Note 삭제 |
| 파 일 |
첨부_붙임1_의견서양식_[Wave_2].hwp |
| 등록일 |
2009-04-20 |